359 Pa. Super. 549 - Kobylinski v. Hipps’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably 427 Pa. Super. 542 - KELLY BY KELLY v. Ickes (1993), 406 Pa. Super. 1 - Biller v. Ziegler (1991)
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Com. Col. of Beaver Cty. v. Soc. of Fac. · Community College v. Community College, Society of the Faculty · 350 Pa. Super. 392 - Maravich v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. · 213 Pa. Super. 282 - Toth v. Philadelphia · Elia v. Olszewski
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“§ 342 Dangerous Conditions Known to Possessor A possessor of land is subject to liability for physical harm caused to licensees by a condition on the land if, but only if, (a) the possessor knows or has reason to know of the condition and should realize that it involves an unreasonable risk of harm to such licensees, and should expect that they will not discover or realize the danger, and (b) he fails to exercise reasonable care to make the condition safe, or to warn the licensees of the condition and the risk involved, and (c) the licensees do not know or have reason to know of the condition and the risk involved. § 343 Dangerous Conditions Known to or Discoverable by Possessor A possessor of land is subject to liability for physical harm caused to his invitees by a condition on the land if, but only if, he (a) knows or by the exercise of reasonable care would discover the condition, and should realize that it involves an unreasonable risk of harm to such invitees, and (b) should expect that they will not discover or realize the danger, or will fail to protect themselves against it, and (c) fails to exercise reasonable care to protect them against the danger. § 343A Known or Obvious Dangers (1) A possessor of land is not liable to his invitees for physical harm caused to them by any activity or condition on the land whose danger is known or obvious to them, unless the possessor should anticipate the harm despite such knowledge or obviousness....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“business visitor” is defined as “a person who is invited to enter or remain on land for a purpose directly connected with business dealings with the possessor of land.” Id. at § 322(3). A”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.