Messer v. Messer’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
April 2011
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Glasscock v. Glasscock · Stevenson v. Stevenson · Woodall v. Woodall · Columbia East Associates v. Bi-Lo, Inc. · McAlister v. Patterson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]hough the terms of the decree grant Husband great latitude in his choice of employment and provide a standard measure for reporting income, Husband’s right to manipulate his income must be governed by what is reasonable in light of the purpose of the agreement and the decree.... Read as a whole, one purpose of the decree was to provide a continuing means of support for Wife that kept pace with Husband’s income. Therefore, we hold the family court did not err by ruling income should be imputed to Husband.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. LaFrance v. LaFrance“an agreement is clear and capable of legal construction, the courts [sic] only function is to interpret its lawful meaning and the intent of the parties as found within the agreement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“However, where 'the language of a * settlement agreement is susceptible of more than one interpretation, it is the duty of the court to ascertain the intentions of the parties.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.