Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 359 So. 2d 1080 - Willis v. Everett

359 So. 2d 1080 - Willis v. Everett’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
June 1993
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 1993

18 state decisions

130197819801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 234 So. 2d 833 - McDaniel v. Welsh · Welch v. Welch · 268 So. 2d 689 - Funderburk v. Temple · 338 So. 2d 338 - Jones v. Louisiana Dept. of Highways · Kinchen v. Hansbrough

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"We hold that where stop signs or other traffic control devices are erected at the direction of an appropriate governmental authority and are thereafter maintained by such authority for a substantial period of time, a post-accident determination that there was no corresponding ordinance in effect will not strip the affected highway of its favored status. Motorists should not be allowed to collaterally attack the legal authority by which such traffic control devices are erected. See Dufore v. Daugereaux, 122 So.2d 666 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1960)."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “at a reasonable speed on a right-of-way street ha[s] a right to assume that a driver approaching from a less favored street will stop for the intersection and yield the right-of-way; the motorist on the right-of-way street has the right to indulge in this assumption until he sees, or should see, that the other car has not observed or is not going to observe the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A. When two vehicles approach or enter an intersection from different highways at approximately the same time, the driver of the vehicle on the left, shall yield the right of way to the vehicle on the right.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.