Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 359 So. 2d 1239 - State v. Doucet

359 So. 2d 1239 - State v. Doucet’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
5
states following
November 2012
most recently cited

1 district · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently November 2012

1 district · 23 state decisions

11019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Katz v. United States · Johnson v. Zerbst · Chimel v. California · Coolidge v. New Hampshire

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"... It means simply that when an issue of ultimate fact has once been determined by a valid and final judgment, that issue cannot again be litigated between the same parties in any future lawsuit...."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “to those cases where it is required by Ashe v. Swenson ....”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““A motion filed under the provisions of this Paragraph must be filed no later than three judicial days before trial on the merits begins, except where the defendant receives notice of trial thirty days before trial on the merits, then such motion must be filed no later than fourteen calendar days before the trial on the merits begins, unless opportunity therefor did not exist or the defendant was not aware of the grounds for the motion. The court in its discretion may permit the filing of such a motion to suppress at any time before or during the trial.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.