Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 359 So. 2d 334 - Barr v. State

359 So. 2d 334 - Barr v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
May 2003
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 2003

14 state decisions

1001978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hawie v. State · Carter v. State · Shipp v. State · Williams v. State · Williamson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “all instructions should be read together, and if the jury is fully and fairly instructed by other instructions, the refusal of a similar instruction is not reversible error.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Ordinarily, where there is a serious question of an accused's sanity or competency to stand trial, that issue should be submitted to a separate jury prior to a trial on the merits of the charges against the accused. ( 330 So.2d at 275 ).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.