¶1In re: Peggy Mattingly Herpel, individually and as Testamentary Executrix of the Succession of AMA Spiller Mattingly, applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of Lafourche. 358 So.2d 960.
¶2Denied.
359 So. 2d 994
Decided November 4, 1977
Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1977-11-04
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 1980
2 state decisions
Relies on Spiller v. Herpel
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1977-11-04
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1In re: Peggy Mattingly Herpel, individually and as Testamentary Executrix of the Succession of AMA Spiller Mattingly, applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of Lafourche. 358 So.2d 960.
¶2Denied.