McClelland v. Briscoe’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 2011
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In the Matters of Lee Roy Murchison and John Whites · In re Oliver · Ex Parte Jimenez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Very candidly, such a procedure as authorized by statute and here employed is to us shocking and is at variance with our conception of the minimum requirements of fair play, within the meaning of due process law.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.