Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

359 S.W.3d 537

State v. Clay

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 2012

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2012-02-21

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 2015

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2012-02-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Anthony Clay (Defendant) appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury convicted him of three counts of first-degree statutory rape, three counts of first-degree statutory sodomy, two *538 counts of first-degree child molestation, one count of second-degree statutory sodomy, and one count of incest.

¶3 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶4 The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

/359/sw3d/537 · .json · Public domain