Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

36 A.3d 362

In re Brady

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 2, 2012

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · decided 2012-02-02

Relies on In Re Fuller · In re Willingham · Attorney Grievance Commission v. Brady

Decided 2012-02-02

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM

¶2On consideration of the certified order of the Maryland Court of Appeals disbarring respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction, see Attorney Grievance Com’n of Maryland v. Brady, 422 Md. 441, 30 A.3d 902 (2011), this court’s November 28, 2011, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court’s order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

¶3ORDERED that Andre L. Brady is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007), and In re Willingham, 900 A.2d 165 (D.C.2006) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate, including those involving disbarment). It is

¶4FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s disbarment will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g).

/36/a3d/362 · .json · Public domain