Fuller v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 1982
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 32 Ala. App. 408 - Kelley v. State · Fuller v. State · 31 Ala. App. 608 - Bringhurst v. State · 33 Ala. App. 40 - Richardson v. State · Jones v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Therein this Court held the foregoing sales slip to be complete as purporting to impose a liability. Hence, the indictment did not need to aver extrinsic facts to show its validity or capacity to injure another who might rely upon it. The opinion held: “We are forced to the conclusion that the disclosure by the instant indictment is sufficient to apprise the court of the fact that it is such an instrument or writing as might injure or defraud, if made use of with that intent.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hamilton v. State““Date Clerk Dept. No. 14 01 500 “Charge To William Samuel Wyatt Jr “Street R.F.D. 3 Box 475 A 10144-46 “Purchaser William S. Waytt, Jr. (sic) “1 suit 39.50 1 ocoat 29.99 64.49 1.29 65.78”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hamilton v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.