36 Ala. App. 560 - Redwine v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1952
Citation profile
32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently April 2016 · most notably Nichols v. State (1958), Wojculewicz v. Cummings (1958)
32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on George v. State · Parrish v. State · McKee v. State · Maund v. State · Burney v. Torrey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The granting of a continuance is purely within the sound discretion of the trial court and his action in’ the premises will not be disturbed- unless gross abuse of discretion appears. Maund v. State, 254 Ala. 452, 48 ,So.2d 553; Smith v. State, 35 Ala.App. 210 , 45 So.2d 172 . In Bryant v. State, 185 Ala. 8 , 64 So. 333 , the Supreme Court held that illness is not a cause for a continuance if an accused can be put to trial without interference with health.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"(T)he State, having established by the preliminary proof the voluntary nature of the confession, was not required to examine every witness present when the confession was made or to array for interrogation every person who might have had access to or conversation with the prisoner during his incarceration in order to remove the prima facie presumption of involuntariness." Logan v. State , 251 Ala. 441 , 444 , 37 So.2d 753 , 755 (1948).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“An application for rehearing amounts to merely a friendly suggestion to an appellate court informing [the court] of possible errors in its rendered opinion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.