Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 36 Ala. App. 596 - Blythe v. Embry

36 Ala. App. 596 - Blythe v. Embry’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
November 2000
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently November 2000

16 state decisions

100195219601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kirkland v. Oates · Varner v. Hardy · Southern Iron Equipment Co. v. Holmes L. Co. · Maxwell & Delehomme v. Moore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The consideration to be paid, and not the subject or thing to be performed, determines whether a contract is entire or severable. If it is expressly, or by implication, apportioned, the contract is sever-able. Kirkland v. Oates, 25 Ala. 465 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.