36 App. D.C. 435 - In re Mraz’s Empirical Analysis
1911
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 1964
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Railway Company v. Sayles · Hobbs v. Beach · 25 App. D.C. 307 - In re Scott · 25 App. D.C. 9 - In re Dilg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`include and claim a specific thing not originally described, merely because it comes within the scope of the genus before disclosed.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Collins · Watson v. Bersworth
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.