Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 36 Ariz. 166 - Smith v. Trott

Smith v. Trott’s Empirical Analysis

1930

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 2014

18 state decisions

60193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barth v. County of Apache · Navajo-Apache Bank & Trust Co. v. Desmont · Mohave County v. Stephens · Stuart v. Norviel · Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. Norviel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If [a] proceeding ... ‘originates’ before any board, officer, or tribunal other than a court, and has been before the superior court for the purpose of a review of such prior determination and not for the purpose of an original inquiry into and determination of the rights of the petitioner, an appeal from the decision of the superior court does not lie to this court, unless some special statute gives one.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.