Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 36 Backes 24 - McGovern v. Van Riper

McGovern v. Van Riper’s Empirical Analysis

1945

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
10
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 6 district · 34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2024 · most notably 133 S. Ct. 1958 - Maryland v. King (2013), 38 Cal. 2d 273 - Gill v. Curtis Publishing Co. (1952)

3 federal appellate · 6 district · 34 state decisions — followed in 10 states

140194519501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Roberson v. . Rochester Folding Box Co. · 112 Cal. App. 285 - Melvin v. Reid · Pavesich v. New England Life Insurance · Vanderbilt v. Mitchell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'the right of an individual to be . . . protected from any wrongful intrusion into his [or her] private life which would outrage or cause mental suffering, shame or humiliation to a person of ordinary sensibilities.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““It is now well settled that the right of privacy having its origin in natural law, is immutable and absolute, and transcends the power of any authority to change or abolish it.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[C]riminal identification is said to have two main purposes: (1) The identification of the accused as the person who committed the crime for which he is being held; and, (2) the identification of the accused as the same person who has been previously charged with, or convicted of, other offenses against the criminal law”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.