36 Cal. 2d 666 - Larson v. Thoresen’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently July 1990
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tupman v. Haberkern · Nelson v. Abraham · Perelli-Minetti v. Lawson · Bastjan v. Bastjan · 62 Cal. App. 2d 68 - Swarthout v. Gentry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where the evidence clearly shows the parties’ intention to engage in a joint enterprise for profit it has been held that the principles governing joint venture apply irrespective of how title to the property is taken. (McNab v. Mills, 199 Cal. 231 [ 248 P. 657 ]; Bastjan v. Bastjan, 215 Cal. 662 [ 12 P.2d 627 ]; Swarthout v. Gentry, 62 Cal.App.2d 68 [ 144 P.2d 38 ].)””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.