Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 36 Cal. 2d 864 - Stott v. Johnston

36 Cal. 2d 864 - Stott v. Johnston’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

109
cited by 109 later decisions
10
states following
September 2008
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 90 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 109 later decisions — most recently September 2008 · most notably 18 Cal. 4th 1 - Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Superior Court (1998), 2 Cal. 3d 285 - Warner Construction Corp. v. City of Los Angeles (1970)

19 federal appellate · 90 state decisions — followed in 10 states

360195119601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Globe Refining Company v. Landa Cotton Oil Company · Grupe v. Glick · Steelduct Co. v. Henger-Seltzer Co. · Moran v. . Standard Oil Co. · 17 Cal. App. 2d 265 - Hacker Pipe & Supply Co. v. Chapman Valve Manufacturing Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 109 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““§ 1732. Definition of Expressed Warranty. Any affirmation of fact or any promise by the seller relating to the goods is an express warranty if the natural tendency of such affirmation or promise is to induce the buyer to purchase the goods, and if the buyer purchases the goods relying thereon. No affirmation of the value of the goods, nor any statement purporting to be a statement of the seller’s opinion only shall be construed as a warranty. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.