36 Cal. 3d 116 - Chefsky v. State Bar’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
154 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 4 Cal. 3d 786 - Himmel v. State Bar · Bradpiece v. State Bar · 7 Cal. 3d 676 - Black v. State Bar · 6 Cal. 3d 909 - Bernstein v. State Bar · 15 Cal. 3d 973 - Doyle v. State Bar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 154 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`Our principal concern is always the protection of the public, the preservation of confidence in the legal profession, and the maintenance of the highest possible professional standard for attorneys.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“... we are reluctant to reverse the decision of the local administrative committee, which was in a better position to evaluate conflicting statements after observing the demeanor of the witnesses and the character of their testimony....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“`Although the State Bar's recommendation as to discipline is entitled to great weight ... we exercise our independent judgment in determining the appropriate punishment for professional misconduct....'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.