Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 36 CALAPP2D 132 - McComsey v. Leaf

McComsey v. Leaf’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

76
cited by 76 later decisions
1
states following
January 1975
most recently cited

76 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently January 1975 · most notably 129 Cal. App. 2d 558 - Cone v. Union Oil Co. (1954), 200 Cal. App. 2d 741 - Snider v. Snider (1962)

76 state decisions

32019391940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Curry v. MacKenzie · Maurice O'Meara Co. v. National Park Bank · Gravenhorst v. . Zimmerman · Bates v. Babcock · 41 Cal. App. 167 - Trout v. Ogilvie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It never could have been, or in justice ought to have been the intention of those who framed our Practice Act and rules thereunder that the decision of such a serious question as this should be flung off on a motion for summary judgment. (Italics ours.) Whatever -the final judgment may be, the defendants were entitled to have the issue deliberately tried, and their right to be heard in the usual manner of a trial protected. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.