In Re Carpenter’s Empirical Analysis
1939
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently September 1963
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In Re McCarty · 65 Cal. App. 420 - In Re Lake · Commercial Bank of Spanish America, Ltd. v. Superior Court · In Re Drew · 63 Cal. App. 657 - Ex Parte Von Gerzabek
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In this proceeding it is the contention of petitioner that the recital of ability to pay contained in the commitment is totally unsupported by any evidence. The respondent contends that in this proceeding the adjudication of ability to comply with the order is conclusive. With this contention we are in accord. The proper rule supported by the citation of many cases, in a case factually similar to the instant case, is thus succinctly stated by the Supreme court in Ex parte Levin, 191 Cal. 207, 208 , [ 215 P. 908 ]; 'The court found as a fact in its order of commitment that the petitioner was able to comply with the order and this adjudication is conclusive on habeas corpus.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Hadley“with knowledge of the making of said order and being able to comply with the terms thereof, disobeyed, and is on this day and in the immediate view and presence of this Court disobeying said order and wilfully refusing and failing and neglecting to obey said order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Hadley“has the ability to pay the aforesaid sum ... and refuses and neglects to pay said sum.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Hadley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.