Okoli v. Lockheed Technical Operations Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 95 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably Brooks v. City of San Mateo (2000), Harris v. County of Orange (2012)
16 federal appellate · 36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Abelleira v. District Court of Appeal · Sanchez v. Standard Brands, Inc. · 52 Cal. 3d 65 - Rojo v. Kliger · Oubichon v. North American Rockwell Corp. · 29 Cal. App. 4th 1718 - Martin v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may rely on federal decisions to interpret analogous parts of the state statute”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“an entirely new basis for the alleged discrimination.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“To exhaust his or her administrative remedies as to a particular act made unlawful by the Fair Employment and Housing Act, the claimant must specify that act in the administrative complaint, even if the complaint does specify other cognizable wrongful acts”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.