Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 36 CUSTCT 46 - Burstrom v. United States

Burstrom v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
December 1975
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on 19 Cust. Ct. 28 - Burgess Battery Co. v. United States · Ramsey v. United States · Protest 71634-K of Greene · Nat E. Berzen, Inc. v. United States · Lunham & Reeve, Inc. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(2) If- (A) any article of metal (except precious metal) manufactured in the United States or subjected to a process of manufacture in the United States is exported for further processing; and (B) the exported article as processed outside the United States, or the article which results from the processing outside the United States, as the case may be, is returned to the United States for further processing, then such article may be returned upon the payment of a duty upon the value of such processing outside the United States at the rate or rates which would apply to such article itself if it were not within the purview of this subparagraph (g).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “* * * Changes and additions to an article constitute alterations, within the meaning of paragraph 1615(g), so long as the articles have not been converted into something else.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.