Ames v. Hager’s Empirical Analysis
36 F. 129 · 1888
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1939
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Arnson v. Murphy · United States v. Huffmaster
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““See. 629. The circuit courts shall have original .-jurisdiction as follows: * * * Fourth. Of all suits at law or in equity arising under any act providing for revenue. * * *””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.