Armstrong v. Ettlesohn’s Empirical Analysis
36 F. 209 · 1888
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 1940
4 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Price v. Abbott · Frelinghuysen v. Baldwin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Upon the face of this declaration, which we can only, look at under this demurrer, there appear to- be three causes of action, which, when aggregated, make more than the amount required to give Jurisdiction.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.