Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 36 F.1d 252 - Fotheringham v. Adams Express Co.

Fotheringham v. Adams Express Co.’s Empirical Analysis

36 F. 252 · 1888

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
August 2005
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2005

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

301888189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Day v. Woodworth · Voltz v. . Blackmar · President of Baltimore v. Boone · Drohn v. Brewer · Green v. Craig

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Punitive damages may be awarded when a wrongful act is done willfully, in a wanton or oppressive manner, or even when it is done recklessly.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.