Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 36 F.1d 275 - Armstrong v. Trautman

Armstrong v. Trautman’s Empirical Analysis

36 F. 275 · 1888

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
June 1943
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1943

5 federal appellate · 1 district ·

601888189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Price v. Abbott · Frelinghuysen v. Baldwin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The provisions of this section, shall not he held to affect the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States in cases commenced by the United States or by direction of any officer thereof, or cases for winding up the affairs of any such bank.” 24 Stat. 552 ; Supp. Rev. St. 614.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.