Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 36 F.1d 560 - Southard v. Brady

Southard v. Brady’s Empirical Analysis

36 F. 560 · 1888

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
October 1935
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 7 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 1935

6 federal appellate · 7 district ·

40188818901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The Key City · Scull v. Raymond

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Exceptional circumstances will sometimes lead a court of admiralty to pronounce a claim stale after a lapse of time less than the legal statutory period of limitation. Where there is nothing exceptional in the case, the court will govern itself by the analogies of the common-law limitations.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “,“In those cases where it is held that the respondent must show that some special interest has been prejudiced by the delay, in order to avail of the defense of staleness, it will be found that the delay was for less than the period prescribed by the local statute in common ilaw actions.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.