Giles v. Paxson’s Empirical Analysis
36 F. 882 · 1888
Citation profile
3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 1932
3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There are two general methods for taking depositions to be used on the trial of law- cases provided for in the Revised Statutes; the one being the mode pointed out in section 863, and the other in section 866. When taken under the provisions of the former section, a commission to the officer is not sued out from the court in which the cause is pending, but the party desiring to take the testimony gives notice to the opposite party or his attorney of the time and place when and where the testimony is to be taken, and selects as the commissioner any one of the parties named in the section. * * * If, however, the depositions are not taken tinder section 863, hut under the authority granted in section 866, then, by the express terms of the latter section, the provisions of sections 863, 864 [Comp. St. § 1473J, and 865 [Oomp. St. § 1474] are not applicable thereto.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.