Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 36 F.2d 381 - The Jacob Luckenbach

The Jacob Luckenbach’s Empirical Analysis

36 F.2d 381 · 1929

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
January 1984
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Kenicott v. The Supervisors · Pennsylvania Cement Co. v. Bradley Contracting Co. · Schermacher v. Yates

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is clear that this statute applies only to ‘wages.’ The wages of the crew were the monthly payments designated in the articles, and these were paid in full. This being a penal statute, it must be strictly construed, and, when so construed, can have no application to a bonus, which is a word of fixed and determinate meaning, and in no sense synonymous with the word ‘wages.’ Petterson v. United States (D.C.) 274 F. 1000 ; Kenicott v. Wayne County, 16 Wall. 452 , 21 L.Ed. 319 .””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.