In re Chakos’s Empirical Analysis
36 F.2d 776 · 1930
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently October 2018
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Priestly v. Hilliard & Tabor · Central Trust Co. v. East Tennessee, V. & G. Ry. Co. · Central Trust Co. of New York v. Chattanooga, R. & C. R. · Grant v. Burns · In re Kranich
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is the established rule in the federal court [ sic ] that funds in custodia legis are not as matter of right subject to either attachment or garnishment. * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.