Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

36 F.3d 1092

Docket No. 94-6125.

Hill v. Hornbaker

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: May 17, 1994 Decided: September 23, 1994.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1994-09-23

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Houck & Sons, Inc. v. Transylvania County

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1994-09-23

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-93-2236)

Garnell Steven Hill, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Richard M. Kastendieck, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hill v. Hornbaker, No. CA-93-2236 (D. Md. Dec. 30, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/36/f3d/1092 · .json · Public domain