Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

36 F.3d 1092

Docket No. 94-6415.

Karacsonyi v. Owens

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: July 6, 1994 Decided: September 26, 1994.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1994-09-26

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Houck & Sons, Inc. v. Transylvania County

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1994-09-26

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-02-381-CRT-H)

Andrew Frank Karacsonyi, Appellant Pro Se.

Barbara Dickerson Kocher, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment for Appellee in this Bivens action.* Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Karacsonyi v. Owens, No. CA-02-381-CRT-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/36/f3d/1092 · .json · Public domain