Carter v. DeTella’s Empirical Analysis
36 F.3d 1385 · 1994
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
March 1995
most recently cited
9 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Kotteakos v. United States · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Murray v. Carrier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“requires the habeas court to evaluate to some extent the probability of the outcome if the case were tried under proper instructions,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Thomas v. Peters · Toney v. Peters“'had substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury's verdict.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Thomas v. Peters · Toney v. Peters“usually involves the admissibility of evidence or the propriety of the argument of counsel. Here, however, we deal with another form of error that arises in the course of trial--instructional error. It is well established at this point that instructional error must be assessed quite differently from other errors that arise in the course of trial. Some are”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Green v. Peters
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.