Armstrong v. Ahitow’s Empirical Analysis
36 F.3d 574 · 1994
Citation profile
12 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently August 2013
12 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Bankers Trust Co. v. Mallis · United States v. Indrelunas · Otis v. City of Chicago · Reichman v. United States Fire Insurance · Harrison v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[because the requirements of Rule 58 were not met ... the time for appeal ha[d] not commenced]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.