Cuevas v. Washington’s Empirical Analysis
36 F.3d 612 · 1994
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
May 2000
most recently cited
11 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Kotteakos v. United States · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Murray v. Carrier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The panel in Falconer noted that even if the petitioner's claim was interpreted as brought under the Illinois Constitution's Due Process Clause, such a claim would be”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Carter v. DeTella · Green v. Peters“requires the habeas court to evaluate to some extent the probability of the outcome if the case were tried under proper instructions,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Thomas v. Peters · Toney v. Peters“Falconer, 905 F.2d at 1134. The petitioner in Falconer did argue to the Illinois Supreme Court that the instructions deprived her of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Green v. Peters
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.