Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 36 F.3d 697 - In the Matter of Marvin C. THIRTYACRE, Debtor-Appellant

In the Matter of Marvin C. THIRTYACRE, Debtor-Appellant’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

181
cited by 181 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 181 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably United States v. Zichettello (2000), In the Matter of Robert Sheridan, Debtor-Appellee. Appeal of City National Bank of Florida (1995)

12 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

680199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 523

Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · First National Bank v. Kimzey · United States v. Douglas · Wheeler v. Laudani · Goldberg Securities, Inc. v. Scarlata

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 181 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) A discharge under section 727 ... does not discharge an individual debtor from any debt— (2) for money, property, services, or an extension, renewal, or refinancing of credit, to the extent obtained by— (A) false pretenses, a false representation, or actual fraud, other than a statement respecting the debtor’s or an insider’s financial condition[.]”
    18 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “does not require ill-will or specific intent to do harm.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(a) A discharge under section 727 ... of this title does not discharge an individual debtor from any debt— (5) to a spouse ... [or] former spouse ... of the debtor ... for alimony to, maintenance for, or support of such spouse ... in connection with a ... divorce decree or other order of a court of record ... but not to the extent that— * * • * * * * (B) such debt includes a liability designated as alimony, maintenance, or support, unless such liability is actually in the nature of alimony, maintenance, or support; (6) for willful and malicious injury by the debtor to another entity or to the property of another entity____”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.