Clark v. Groose’s Empirical Analysis
36 F.3d 770 · 1994
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Wolff v. McDonnell · Turner v. Safley · Hewitt v. Helms · Brown-El v. Delo · Sperry v. Bauermeister, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an inmate facing disciplinary proceedings is entitled to, among other things, advance written notice of the claimed misconduct and a hearing at which he may call witnesses and present documentary evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Turner v. Caspari“must prove that the distinction between himself and the other inmates was not reasonably related to some legitimate penological purpose.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. DeHart v. Horn
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.