Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 36 F.3d 821 - United States v. Mathews

United States v. Mathews’s Empirical Analysis

36 F.3d 821 · 1994

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
June 2022
most recently cited

12 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 2022

12 federal appellate ·

1701994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1111 · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 844 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 26 U.S.C. § 5861 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968)

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Albernaz v. United States · Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Broyles · Moody v. Smith · United States v. Restrepo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Congress intended to punish both the crime of violence effected by the use of the bomb under 18 U.S.C. [§ 844] and, cumulatively, to add the punishment for carrying the bomb in relation to this crime of violence. 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)(1) and (2).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If death resulted, or the offense was intended to cause death or serious bodily injury, apply the most analogous guideline from Chapter Two, Part A.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “each [offense] requires proof of a fact which the other does not.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.