United States v. Narramore’s Empirical Analysis
36 F.3d 845 · 1994
Citation profile
28 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently January 2015 · most notably United States v. Eyler (1995), United States v. Covarrubias (1995)
28 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553
Relies on Oklahoma v. New Mexico · Corbitt v. New Jersey · United States v. McKinney · United States v. Johnson · United States v. Tello
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“by timely notifying authorities of [the defendant's] intention to enter a plea of guilty, thereby permitting the government to avoid preparing for trial and permitting the court to allocate its resources efficiently,”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“clearly demonstrates acceptance of responsibility for his offense.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“unconstitutional merely because they are intended to encourage a defendant to forgo constitutionally protected conduct”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.