United States v. Diggins’s Empirical Analysis
2022
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21b of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 18 U.S.C. § 249 (Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 5032 · 34 U.S.C. § 12361 · 34 U.S.C. § 30501 · 34 U.S.C. § 30503 · 34 U.S.C. § 30507
Relies on Brown et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka et al. · Griffin v. Breckenridge · Wisconsin v. Yoder · Patterson v. McLean Credit Union · Sherbert v. Verner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[A] litigant has an obligation to spell out its arguments squarely and distinctly' before the district court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.