Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 36 FSUPP 95 - In re Sabul

In re Sabul’s Empirical Analysis

1940

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
November 1979
most recently cited

1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 1979

1 district ·

201940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 109

Relies on In re Ghiglione · In re Morris · In re Shon · In re National Carbon Co. · In Re Wilkes-Barre Hotel Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Tax costs and render judgments therefor against the unsuccessful party, against the successful party for cause, in part against each of the parties, and against estates, in proceedings under this title.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.