¶1The motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds only; the evidence authorized the verdict for the defendant, and the refusal to grant the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was not error.
¶2Judgment affirmed.
36 Ga. App. 100
Decided November 9, 1926
Court of Appeals of Georgia · decided 1926-11-09
Decided 1926-11-09
¶1The motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds only; the evidence authorized the verdict for the defendant, and the refusal to grant the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was not error.
¶2Judgment affirmed.