Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 36 Ill. App. 2d 112 - Schoenbrod v. Rosenthal

36 Ill. App. 2d 112 - Schoenbrod v. Rosenthal’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
1
states following
December 1995
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently December 1995 · most notably County of Cook v. Midcon Corp. (1985), 39 Ill. App. 3d 1057 - Pierog v. H. F. Karl Contractors, Inc. (1976)

3 federal appellate · 31 state decisions

2401962197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In cases based on fraud far greater emphasis is placed on the delay in asserting the claim than on a change of circumstances, for an unreasonable lapse of time between discovering the supposed fraud and bringing the suit is of itself prejudicial to the party charged with fraud. The very nature of the charge calls for prompt action. An unexplained delay raises an immediate doubt as to a plaintiffs right to ask the intervention of a court of equity which is an appeal to justice and good conscience. One who requests the help of a court of equity must be of good faith and must be diligent in prosecuting his claim. The natural reaction of a person who has been defrauded is to cry out in protest and to move with alacrity in seeking redress. When he does neither, his claim and his motives are suspect.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.