Schnull v. Cuddy’s Empirical Analysis
1905
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 1927
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Wood v. Wack · Carver v. Louthain · Froman v. Rous
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““What was the market price of canned tomatoes per dozen of the kind and quality mentioned, in said contract, at Sellersburg, Ind., on or about the 1st day of October, 1901?””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““The answers upon which appellants rely are indefinite. They do not show every essential fact necessary to a recovery.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.