Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 36 MICH 48 - Osborn v. Osborn

Osborn v. Osborn’s Empirical Analysis

1877

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
4
states following
September 1957
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently September 1957

6 state decisions

10187718801890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The circuit judge thought the case came within the principle of Pipp v. Reynolds, 20 Mich. 88 ; Turner v. McCarty, 22 Id. 265, and Halsted v. Francis, 31 Id. 113. In each of those cases the plaintiff counted on a promise .made to a third person, — not to himself. In this case the plaintiff counts upon a promise made to herself, and the -only question is whether she establishes it.” .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.