Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 36 MINN 388 - Coles v. Yorks

Coles v. Yorks’s Empirical Analysis

1887

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
January 1918
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 1918

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

101887189019001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Vance v. Fore · Lunt v. Holland · Jackson ex dem. Young & Devereux v. Camp · Benedict v. Gaylord · Jackson ex dem. People v. Wendell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When there is a description by courses and distances, and another by reference to known monuments, the latter prevails; and a map or plan referred to (certainly if a public record) stands upon the same footing as a monument.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.