Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

36 Mo. 279

State v. Bernoudy

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1865

Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1865-10-15

Bernoudy was elected recorder for St. Louis county in 1860. Held: that the Convention had exceeded its powers, and that the office was not vacant, from which judgment an appeal was taken.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1865-10-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently October 1939

8 state decisions

3018651870188018901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Holmes, Judge,

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2This is an ex-officio information in the nature of quo warranto, filed in this court by the circuit attorney of the county of St. Louis against the defendant, for usurpation of the office of recorder of said county, and praying judgment of ouster and costs. The defendant filed his answer or plea, on *281which the circuit attorney on behalf of the State now asks judgment by motion in the nature of a demurrer. The plea or answer of the defendant contains nothing which constitutes any valid defence in law or fact to the information.

¶3The motion is sustained; and the court further considering that no evidence is offered to charge the defendant with any evil intent, and it being probable that he acted from mistaken views only, will not avail itself of the power given by law to impose a fine on him, and will condemn him to pay the cost only of this proceeding.

The other judges concur.
/36/mo/279 · .json · Public domain