Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

36 Mo. 452

State v. McAdoo

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1865

Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1865-10-15

<p>Constitution — Election—Office.—By the Constitution, Art. II., § 8, no vote can be counted for, nor any certificate of election granted to, any candidate who has not taken and filed the oath of loyalty within fifteen days next preceding the election. A certificate of election granted to one who has not thus taken and filed the oath is null and void.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1865-10-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1913

3 state decisions

10186518701880189019001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Wagner, Judge,

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2This is an infoi’mation, in the nature of a quo warranto, filed by the Attorney General against Foster J. McAdoo, re*453quiring liim to show by what authority he exercises the functions and duties of the office of sheriff of Laclede county.

¶3No answer has been filed in this court by MeAdoo to the writ, which has been duly served and returned.

¶4It appears from the record, that at an election held in Laclede county on the 5th day of September last, for sheriff of said county, the defendant and several other persons were candidates for the said office of sheriff, and that he received the highest number of votes cast, but had failed to take, file and subscribe the oath required of candidates by the Constitution of this State, within fifteen days next preceding the election.

¶5By sec. 8 of Art. II. of the Constitution, no vote in any election by the people shall be cast up, nor shall any certificate of election be granted to any person who shall not within fifteen days next preceding such election have taken, subscribed and filed said oath.

¶6MeAdoo, having omitted to comply with the requirements of the Constitution, was ineligible; and the casting up the votes, and issuing the certificate to him, were acts unauthorized by law, and null and void. We are of opinion, therefore, that, in exercising the rights and privileges, and receiving the emoluments of said office, he has been guilty of usurpation, and we accordingly adjudge that he be ousted therefrom.

¶7Having no evidence that he acted from any other than mistaken views, we forbear imposing any fine on him, and only order that he pay the costs.

Judge Holmes concurs; Judge Lovelace absent.
/36/mo/452 · .json · Public domain