Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 36 Ohio App. 3d 162 - State v. Smith

36 Ohio App. 3d 162 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
September 2008
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2008

15 state decisions

60198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Perry · State v. Lytle · State v. Smith · State v. Cole

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must submit sufficient operative facts or evidentiary documents which, if proven, would show that appellant was prejudiced by said ineffective counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “is presumed to execute his duties in an ethical and competent manner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.