Hukill v. Tharp

Decided November 19, 1912

Supreme Court of Oklahoma · decided 1912-11-19

Brror from District Court, Ottawa County; T. L. Brown, Judge. Action by J. T. Hukill and others against J. B. Tharp and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently August 1913

2 state decisions

Relies on Cox v. Rogers · Rice v. Jones · Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Rath

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Dismissed · Decided 1912-11-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 Opinion by

SHARP, C.

¶2 The petition in error and case-made was filed in this court January 9, 1911. Plaintiffs in error have filed no brief; nor have they asked for an extension of time in which to prepare and file brief. It will therefore be considered that the appeal has been abandoned; and the petition in error should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution. Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 Pac. 205; Rice et al. v. Jones et al., 32 Okla. 734, 124 Pac. 67; Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Rath, 32 Okla. 857, 124 Pac. 59.

¶3 By the Court: It is so ordered.